Step up you Welsh radical politicians and young people

December 19th, 2011

Aneurin BevanWatching Ed Milliband dance a ballet of indecision and uttering lightweight response to the Euro crisis and our economy has been excruciatingly painful. Similarly listening to Carwyn Jones political statements in the Welsh Assembly and the press were just like being stoned to death with popcorn. Our Welsh politicians have all been dancing together, jockeying for advantage and selling their souls to pass the Budget, but always with an eye on public opinion and a reluctance to put their head above the parapet.

Where are Welsh radicals of history like Anaeurin Bevan who single-mindedly fought to establish the National Health Service in July 1948, ensuring my birth seven weeks later was free to my parents at the point of delivery (literally)? Indeed one of his famous quotes could be his verdict on current politicians.

We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of the road. They get run down.

We sadly miss Welsh radicals like David Lloyd-George, who for all his deep flaws, was the architect of educational reform and social benefits. He got to the heart of the matter when debating in Parliament on the new idea of unemployment benefit:

You cannot feed the hungry on statistics

Our lightweight, self-serving and ineffective politicians seem to have had every drop of radical blood removed and simple don’t or won’t recognise the need for radical solutions to the issues faced by today’s society. Indeed, they would shy from the dictionary definition of radical:

…a person who advocates fundamental political, economic, and social reforms by direct and often uncompromising methods

My passion for justice has been fuelled by many people who were uncompromising in their quests for reform. People like the great Christian reformers such as William, Wilberforce, John Groom, John Newton, Lord Shaftesbury and Elizabeth Fry. Campaigners for equality and social justice like Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King.

When I grew up, my teenage years were the 1960s and I drank in every drop of news and information about the Civil Rights Movement, the Anti-Vietnam War movement and shaped my musical taste with the protest songs of Pete Seeger, Woodie Guthrie, Joan Baez, Bob Dylan, Phil Ochs, Donovan and others. Thank goodness we still have Billy Bragg today carrying the torch – his unaccompanied singing of the Internationale always has me in tears.

Students were at the vanguard of reform in the 1960′s and individuals like Daniel Cohn Bendit and Tariq Ali were young focal points for students and others. Today, the Occupy Movement has adopted the view, misguided in my opinion, that everyone is equal and no individual needs to be a leader or spokesman. They need to learn the lessons of history – battles are fought around a leader and a flag. Wider society can then evaluate the arguments in the way they are familiar with.

I’ve given up on today’s politicians. There are young people out there burning with passion, energy and zeal that need to declare themselves, step up to the plate and be the leaders they are and then change Wales, the UK and the wider world for the greater good of the people.

Clarkson: Reality of Bigotry about Suicide

December 4th, 2011
Gary Speed

Gary Speed

In a week when sports fans throughout the UK were saddened by the suicide of Gary Speed, I could not believe what I was hearing on the BBC1 One Show when Jeremy Clarkson made tasteless, insensitive and grossly inappropriate comments about people who chose to end their life on a railway line. For some reason, the media only latched on to the comments he made about strikers, who were demonstrating that day and our newspapers and TV have reported on the huge offence he gave to the trades union movement, generating some 25,000 complaints to the BBC.

In his regular column in the Sun on 3 December, Clarkson continued his whining complaints, describing those who choose to jump in front of trains as “Johnny Suicide”. He went on to make outrageously offensive comments about the bodies of those who had died on the railway Clearly, Clarkson has not experienced the torment of someone whose life is so excruciatingly painful that they see no alternative but to bring it to an end or the pain of the relatives who blame themselves because they did not read the signs of distress.

Last Monday, another man took his life. That man was Roger Crouch from Winchcombe, Gloucestershire, father of a 15-year-old boy. Dominic Crouch, who had six months previously, jumped from the roof of a six storey building because he had been unmercifully bullied at school. Fellow pupils in Dominic’s Gloucestershire school had taunted Dominic, calling him gay. Shortly after Dominic’s death, Roger Crouch was quoted as saying,

“If Dominic had not been the subject of rumours that he was gay it is highly unlikely he would have taken his own life.”

Roger & Dominic Crouch

Roger & Dominic Crouch

Roger became a tireless campaigner against teenage suicide and was awarded the Stonewall “Hero of the Year” award earlier this year. At the ceremony, he said,

“I see this as an award for Dom. By choosing us for this award you’ve also chosen to take a stand alongside all the young people whose lives have been ended by bullying.”

His wife Paola posted a moving piece in the Facebook page, Friends of Don Crouch against Bullying,

“I have the saddest news to give you. The love of my life and Giulia and Domi’s beloved Dad, died tonight. The changes you have started, for young people everywhere, the work you have done against bullying will remain as a towering monument to you. Our hearts break Roger, Domi, Giulia and I loved you so much.”

This is the reality of suicide that Clarkson has chosen to trivialise: three lives needlessly ended, two families devastated, many thousands of people who held Gary Speed in regard confused and distressed, the friends and families of Roger and Dominic shattered and distraught.

–oOo–

Useful support organisation related to suicide:

PAPYRUS UK Support organisation for teens thinking of suicide
Samaritans General support line
The Trevor Project USA Support organisation for gay, lesbian youth

The Grapes of Wrath and the 99%

November 23rd, 2011

Cover: The Grapes of WrathThe Guardian carried a piece by Melvyn Bragg titled, John Steinbeck’s bitter fruit that drew chilling parallels between the corporate greed and joblessness of Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath and the situation in Britain today. Steinbeck has always been my favourite author since schooldays. I travelled from the bittersweet Of Mice and Men, via the wonderful Cannery Row and Tortilla Flats to the harrowing East of Eden and The Grapes of Wrath, a highly political novel for which Steinbeck received huge criticism. It was banned in schools and libraries, publicly burned, vilified on talk radio and condemned in Congress. Happily, most of all, it was read.

Steinbeck was clear about the guilt of the bankers in the Great Depression. As he prepared to write the novel, he said of them,

“I want to put a tag of shame on the greedy bastards who are responsible for this [the Great Depression and its effects].”

He made a statement in chapter 5 of the novel, published in 1939, which is even more true in 2011:

“The bank is something more than men, I tell you. It’s the monster. Men made it, but they can’t control it.”

Then in chapter 14 a passage could have been written for the “We are the 99%” of the Occupy movement:

“This is the beginning—from “I” to “we”. If you who own the things people must have could understand this, you might preserve yourself. If you could separate causes from results, if you could know that Paine, Marx, Jefferson, Lenin were results, not causes, you might survive. But that you cannot know. For the quality of owning freezes you forever into “I”, and cuts you off forever from the “we”. “

In 1962, he won the Nobel Prize for Literature despite the New York Times vilifying the award the day before,

“The Swedes have made a serious error by giving the prize to a writer whose limited talent is in his best books watered down by 10th-rate philosophising”

However, the Nobel Prize committee cited Grapes of Wrath as a “great work” and as one of the committee’s main reasons for granting Steinbeck the prize.

The saddest thing for me as I leafed back through my old copy of The Grapes of Wrath was that we never seem to learn the lessons of history. The Second World War that came hard on the heels of the Great Depression prevented social unrest arising from the poverty and anger from finding expression against the privileged few who prospered. We have fought two world wars and are still embroiled in military action overseas. People are finding expression for their anger and frustration through the Occupy movement. Let’s learn the lessons this time.

 

Footnote: Three unrelated Steinbeck facts.

 

  • Despite what most people think, “I know this… a man got to do what he got to do” was not said first by John Wayne, it was a quote from The Grapes of Wrath.
  • John Steinbeck Toured Wales in 1959 whilst researching The Acts of King Arthur and his Noble Knights which was published posthumously in 1976.
  • He used George Borrows’ wonderful book Wild Wales: Its People, Language and scenery for background for his first novel, Cup of Gold, about the Welsh pirate Henry Morgan.